Watch This Episode: Our Phuket Real Estate Podcast
Our podcast covers all the topics for property investors looking at buying real estate in Thailand.
Using Thai shareholders as nominees so that a foreigner indirectly owns land is illegal, and a 51/49 share split on its own does not make it legal. Think of it like trying to cut corners on a big project; it might seem quicker, but it often leads to much bigger problems down the line. We’ll explore why this setup is so problematic, what the legal and financial consequences can be, and what you should be doing instead.
Key Takeaways
- Using a Thai property nominee structure, where Thai nationals hold shares on behalf of foreigners, is illegal and can lead to severe penalties like fines, imprisonment, and company dissolution.
- Ongoing costs for companies owning property include annual audits, corporate tax, and legal/accounting fees, which can add up and must be managed properly.
- Reputational damage can occur if arrangements are seen as non-compliant or tax-avoidant, impacting future business dealings in Thailand.
Understanding the Thai Property Nominee Structure
So, you’re looking at buying property in Thailand, and you’ve heard about this ‘nominee’ thing. It’s basically a way for foreigners to get around the rules that limit how much of a Thai company a foreigner can own, especially when it comes to owning land. The idea is that Thai nationals hold the majority of the shares – usually 51% or more – in a company. This allows the company to buy property, which a company with majority foreign ownership generally can’t do. The foreigner then effectively controls the company, but the shares are technically in someone else’s name.
The Concept of Nominee Shareholding Explained
At its heart, nominee shareholding is about appearances. A Thai citizen is listed as a shareholder, fulfilling the legal requirement for majority Thai ownership. However, this Thai shareholder often has no real financial stake or decision-making power. They are essentially acting as a placeholder, a ‘straw man’, for the foreign investor. This arrangement is often used because setting up a Thai-majority company can be simpler and require less capital than registering a foreign-owned entity.
Workarounds for Foreign Ownership Restrictions
Thailand’s Foreign Business Act (FBA) puts limits on foreign ownership in certain sectors, and land ownership is a big one. For foreigners, owning land directly is generally not permitted. A 51/49 split alone does not make it legal, and using Thai nominees for a foreign owner is illegal.
The Underlying Risks of Nominee Arrangements
While it might seem like a straightforward solution, these arrangements are fraught with peril. The Thai authorities are increasingly cracking down on these structures, viewing them as illegal attempts to circumvent foreign ownership laws. The Thai Civil and Commercial Code can render such agreements void, meaning you could lose everything. It’s not just a minor administrative issue; it can lead to serious legal and financial trouble for everyone involved. The core problem is that the nominee shareholder is, legally speaking, the owner of those shares, not you. This creates a fundamental disconnect between who controls the company and who legally owns it, which is where most of the problems arise.
Legal Ramifications of Nominee Shareholding
Using Thai nationals as nominees to get around foreign ownership rules is a really bad idea, legally speaking. It’s not just a bit dodgy; it’s actually against the law in Thailand. The Civil and Commercial Code basically says these arrangements are void from the start. If the authorities catch on that your Thai shareholders are just fronts for foreign control, the consequences can be pretty severe. We’re talking about hefty fines, potential prosecution, and even the possibility of the company being shut down altogether. Foreigners involved could be told to sort out these illegal shareholdings, and companies set up purely to hold assets without any real business activity are also not recognised and can be dissolved. It’s a risky game, and honestly, the potential downsides are much bigger than any perceived benefits.
Violations of Thai Law and Penalties
The Foreign Business Act (FBA) of 1999 specifically prohibits the use of nominee shareholders. This isn’t just a suggestion; it’s a criminal offence. Companies found to be in breach of the FBA can face fines of up to 1 million Baht. Not only that, but the individuals involved, including the nominee shareholders themselves, can face imprisonment. It’s a serious matter that can lead to significant legal trouble for everyone involved.
Consequences for Foreigners and Nominees
For foreigners, getting caught using a nominee structure can mean being ordered to terminate the illegal shareholding. This could involve losing control of their investment or being forced to sell their stake under duress. For the Thai nominees, the risks are even more direct. They could face prosecution, fines, and imprisonment. Their names appearing on multiple company registrations as nominees can be a major red flag for authorities, making them particularly vulnerable.
Void Arrangements and Company Dissolution
Any arrangement that relies on nominee shareholders to circumvent foreign ownership laws is considered void under Thai law. This means the agreement has no legal standing. If a company is found to have such arrangements, especially if it’s deemed to be operating without genuine business activities and solely for asset holding, it can be subject to dissolution. This effectively means the company ceases to exist, and its assets may be dealt with by the authorities.
Financial Obligations and Hidden Costs
Where a villa is held through an existing company, we explain how the structure works and what it costs to run each year, and we recommend independent Thai legal and tax advice before you buy shares or commit. But hold on, the paperwork and payments aren’t over yet. Owning property this way means you’ve got ongoing financial duties to sort out. It’s not just about the purchase price; there are regular costs that can really add up if you’re not prepared. Failing to keep up with these can land you in hot water with the authorities.
Annual Audits and Corporate Tax
Every Thai company needs to have its accounts audited each year by a certified auditor. This is a legal requirement to make sure everything is above board. After the audit, the company has to file tax returns. The standard corporate tax rate is 20% on net profits. So, if your company makes money from renting out the property, or from selling it, that profit gets taxed. You’ll need to keep really good records of all income and expenses to work out what you owe. It’s a bit of a chore, but it’s essential for staying compliant.
Legal and Accounting Fees
Beyond the audits and taxes, you’ll also have to pay for legal and accounting services. Lawyers and accountants are needed to help with the annual filings, keeping company records updated, and generally making sure you’re following all the rules. These fees can vary, but it’s wise to budget for them. Getting cheap advice can sometimes cost you more in the long run if mistakes are made.
Here’s a rough idea of what you might expect for ongoing services:
| Service | Estimated Annual Cost (THB) |
|---|---|
| Company Secretary | 10,000 – 20,000 |
| Annual Audit | 15,000 – 30,000 |
| Tax Filing & Accounting | 20,000 – 40,000 |
Personal Tax Implications of Company Property Use
Now, this is where it can get a bit tricky. If you personally use a property owned by your company – say, you live in it – the Thai Revenue Department might see that as a benefit you’ve received. This benefit can be taxed as personal income. It’s not always straightforward, and the rules can be a bit vague, so getting specific advice is really important. If you’re taking money out of the company as dividends, that’s also subject to personal income tax. It’s all about making sure you’re not accidentally falling foul of tax laws by how you use the company’s assets.
It’s easy to overlook these ongoing costs when you’re focused on the excitement of buying property. But these financial obligations are real and need to be factored into your budget from day one. Ignoring them can lead to penalties, and in worst-case scenarios, could even put the property itself at risk.
Reputational Damage and Business Integrity
If people think your company is just a front to dodge the rules or avoid taxes, it can make doing business in Thailand a lot harder. This is especially true if you’ve got other ventures going on there. It’s always better to be upfront and make sure your company is playing by the book.
Transparency and Legal Compliance
Being open about how your company is set up and making sure it follows all the laws is pretty important. If authorities get the idea that your company is just a shell, created solely to hold property without any real business activity, you’re asking for trouble. This could lead to fines, or worse, the forced sale of your property. It’s not worth the risk.
Avoiding Perceptions of Tax Evasion
Authorities are getting sharper at spotting companies that seem to exist only to avoid taxes or get around foreign ownership rules. If your company is seen this way, it can seriously damage your standing. It’s vital that your business activities are genuine and that your financial dealings are above board. Think about it: if your company isn’t making any money, how is it supposed to pay for its own running costs, let alone taxes? This can put the property itself in jeopardy.
Impact on Future Business Ventures
Getting caught up in a nominee structure scandal, even unintentionally, can have long-term consequences. It might make it harder to get loans, attract investors, or even get permits for future projects. Building a good reputation takes time, but it can be ruined pretty quickly if your business practices are questioned. It’s always best to get solid legal advice and structure your ownership correctly from the start.
Lessons from Failed Property Ventures
It’s easy to get swept up in the dream of owning property in Thailand, but unfortunately, not everyone’s story ends with a picturesque beachfront villa. Many have learned the hard way that cutting corners or trying to bypass regulations can lead to significant trouble. These failures often stem from a few common mistakes, and understanding them is key to avoiding a similar fate.
The Pitfalls of Shell Corporations
One of the most frequent reasons for failure is the creation of what are essentially shell corporations. These are companies set up with the sole purpose of holding property, lacking any genuine business activities, employees, or revenue streams. Thai authorities are increasingly adept at spotting these arrangements, viewing them as attempts to circumvent foreign ownership laws. When a company has no discernible business operations, it immediately raises a red flag, potentially leading to investigations, hefty fines, and even the forced sale of the property.
The Dangers of Unreliable Legal Advice
Another common thread in failed ventures is relying on subpar or unqualified legal advice. Some buyers have been steered towards questionable structures or given assurances that don’t hold up under scrutiny. This often involves advice that downplays the risks associated with nominee shareholders or suggests that a company with minimal actual business is perfectly acceptable. When things go wrong, and the authorities step in, the consequences can be severe, leaving the buyer with no property and significant financial losses. It highlights the absolute necessity of engaging with reputable legal professionals who specialise in Thai property law and understand the nuances of foreign ownership.
Consequences of Dodgy Nominee Shareholders
The use of nominee shareholders, where Thai nationals hold shares on behalf of a foreigner to meet legal requirements, is a particularly perilous path. In many failed cases, the nominees were not truly independent or were not properly compensated or informed. This can lead to disputes, where the nominee might try to assert control or claim ownership, or where their involvement is deemed a sham by the authorities. When the arrangement is exposed as a means to illegally bypass foreign ownership limits, the consequences can include:
- Legal penalties for both the foreign investor and the nominee.
- The company’s arrangements being declared void.
- The property being confiscated or sold off by the state.
It’s a stark reminder that attempting to circumvent the law, even with seemingly simple workarounds, rarely ends well. The authorities are vigilant, and the penalties for non-compliance are substantial.
Best Practices for Compliant Property Ownership
Right then, so you’re thinking about buying property in Thailand, and maybe you’ve heard about setting up a Thai company to do it. Some villas in Phuket are held through existing Thai limited companies that own the land and buildings. This is not a way for a foreigner to own Thai land indirectly. The company has to qualify to own land in its own right, and its Thai shareholders have to be genuine investors acting for themselves. A 51/49 split alone does not make it legal, and using Thai nominees for a foreign owner is illegal. If the company’s only job is to own property, that’s a big red flag for the authorities. They’re getting pretty sharp-eyed about this stuff these days.
Seeking Reputable Legal Counsel
Don’t skimp on this. Getting advice from a lawyer who really knows their stuff about Thai property law and company setup is absolutely vital. They can guide you through all the regulations, help you structure the company correctly, and make sure you’re not accidentally breaking any rules. It’s easy to find advice online, but not all of it is accurate, and some of it might even be downright wrong. A good lawyer will save you a lot of headaches and potential legal trouble down the line.
Maintaining Meticulous Records
You’ve got to keep everything in order. This means proper accounting, filing annual audits, and submitting tax returns on time. You also need to keep records of any changes to the company, like updates to shareholder details. If you don’t keep good records, it’s easy to miss deadlines or submit incorrect information, which can lead to fines. It’s a bit like keeping your receipts for your own taxes – you need proof of everything. Having clear, organised records shows you’re running a legitimate operation and makes life much easier if anyone asks questions.
Government Scrutiny and Enforcement Actions
The Thai authorities are really cracking down on dodgy nominee arrangements these days. It’s not just a rumour; there have been some pretty significant cases that show they mean business. The Department of Business Development (DBD) and the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) are working together, looking closely at companies, especially in popular areas like Phuket and Chonburi, that might be using Thai nationals as fronts for foreign ownership.
Increased Vigilance on Foreign Ownership
There’s a definite shift towards more rigorous checks on how foreigners own property and businesses. The government is keen to make sure that Thai law is being followed, particularly concerning sectors where foreign investment is restricted. This means they’re looking beyond just the paperwork and trying to see if the actual business operations align with the ownership structure.
Notable Crackdowns on Nominee Companies
We’ve seen some high-profile cases recently. For instance, back in September 2024, a law and accounting firm in Phuket was found to have set up nominee structures for over 60 companies. These companies were essentially using Thai nominees to buy land and avoid taxes, often by shuffling ownership through share transfers rather than direct registration. It’s a clear example of how these arrangements can lead to serious trouble.
Court Rulings and Penalties Imposed
When these nominee schemes are uncovered, the consequences can be severe. In that Phuket case, for example, 23 Thai and foreign individuals were penalised. Sentences, though reduced and suspended for cooperation, still involved probation, and hefty fines were handed out – THB 200,000 per person. What’s more, the companies involved were ordered to be dissolved. It really highlights that using nominees isn’t just a slap on the wrist; it can mean the end of the business and significant personal penalties.
Authorities are using sophisticated methods to spot these arrangements. They look for things like:
- Unusual Shareholding Patterns: Thai shareholders who don’t seem to be actively involved or contributing financially.
- Foreign-Sourced Funding: Where the capital for Thai shareholders actually comes from foreign investors.
- Disproportionate Control: When foreigners have far more say in decisions than their shareholding might suggest.
- Irregular Financial Transactions: Loans or dividend payments that don’t make much business sense.
- Board Composition: A board that’s mostly foreign with very little genuine Thai oversight.
The government’s increased focus means that any company solely existing to hold property without genuine business activities is a prime target for investigation. It’s a risky game to play, and the penalties can be substantial, including potential company dissolution and fines.
The Future of Foreign Property Ownership
The way foreigners can own property in Thailand is always changing. It’s a bit like trying to predict the weather, really – you can look at the trends, but nothing’s ever guaranteed. The government is keeping a closer eye on things, especially when it comes to how foreigners are buying property. There’s been a lot of talk about potential new rules, and some of these could make it harder for people who’ve used nominee arrangements to hold onto their properties. It’s not just about buying a nice villa; it’s about making sure you’re doing it the right way, so you don’t end up in a sticky situation later on. The market itself is quite active, with a lot of interest from overseas buyers, which is good for the economy, but it also means the government has to think carefully about how to manage things fairly for everyone. They’re trying to balance attracting investment with making sure local interests are protected. It’s a tricky balancing act, and any changes will probably reflect that. So, while buying property here can be a great move, it’s really important to stay informed about what’s happening legally. Getting good advice from a local expert is probably the smartest thing you can do to avoid any nasty surprises. It’s all about playing by the rules to protect your investment.
Potential Legislative Changes
There’s a definite buzz about possible changes to the laws governing foreign property ownership. The focus seems to be on closing loopholes. If new regulations are introduced, they could have significant implications for existing arrangements, potentially forcing sales or leading to other penalties.
Market Trends and Investor Demand
We’re seeing a steady stream of foreign buyers, especially from countries like China and South Korea, showing a keen interest in the Thai property market. This demand is particularly noticeable in the condo sector. Such strong interest naturally puts pressure on existing regulations and might encourage the government to either adapt its rules or perhaps tighten them further to manage the market’s growth and impact.
Balancing Investment with National Interests
Foreign investment is a big plus for Thailand’s economy, bringing in capital and creating jobs. However, it also brings up questions about property prices and ensuring locals can still afford homes. The government’s challenge is to find that sweet spot – encouraging foreign investment while also safeguarding the interests of Thai citizens and the country’s land resources. Future ownership rules will likely be shaped by this ongoing effort to find that balance. It’s a complex puzzle they’re trying to solve, and how they do it will shape the market for years to come. For those looking to buy, understanding these dynamics is key to making a sound decision, perhaps looking at options like those offered by Ocean Worldwide Phuket Real Estate.
Identifying Nominee Shareholder Indicators
So, how do you spot a nominee shareholder arrangement? It’s not always obvious, but there are definitely red flags to look out for. Authorities are getting sharper at spotting these setups, so it’s good to know what they’re looking for.
The Concept of Nominee Shareholding Explained
Essentially, a nominee shareholder is someone who holds shares in a company on paper, but they don’t actually own them or have any real control. They’re acting on behalf of someone else, usually a foreigner who wants to get around Thailand’s foreign ownership rules. The Thai national appears to be the majority shareholder, meeting the legal requirement for Thai majority ownership, but the real power and financial benefit stays with the foreigner.
Workarounds for Foreign Ownership Restrictions
Foreigners often turn to nominee structures because certain business sectors and property ownership are restricted. For instance, owning land outright as a foreigner is generally not permitted. To get around this, a company is set up with Thai nationals holding the majority of shares (51% or more). Using Thai shareholders as nominees so that a foreigner indirectly owns land is illegal, and a 51/49 share split on its own does not make it legal. A Thai company can own land only where the company genuinely qualifies under Thai law and its Thai shareholders are real investors acting for themselves, not holding shares for you. The foreigner effectively controls the company through the nominee shareholders, but this is where the legal trouble can start.
The Underlying Risks of Nominee Arrangements
These arrangements are fundamentally illegal under Thai law. The Civil and Commercial Code can render such agreements void. If discovered, the consequences can be severe. Companies might face hefty fines, and the entire company could be dissolved. The nominee shareholders themselves could face prosecution. It’s a precarious position to be in, and the potential downsides far outweigh any perceived convenience.
Violations of Thai Law and Penalties
Using nominee shareholders to bypass foreign ownership laws is a direct violation of the Foreign Business Act (FBA) and the Land Code Act. Penalties can include substantial fines, potentially up to 1 million Baht for companies, and even imprisonment for the nominee. The authorities are increasingly scrutinising companies, especially those in sectors like real estate, tourism, and hospitality, looking for these kinds of arrangements.
Consequences for Foreigners and Nominees
For foreigners, the main consequence is that any property or business interests acquired through a nominee structure could be confiscated. They might be ordered to divest their holdings. Nominees, on the other hand, face direct legal action, including fines and potential jail time. It’s a serious matter that can have long-lasting repercussions for everyone involved.
Void Arrangements and Company Dissolution
If a nominee arrangement is uncovered, the agreement between the foreigner and the nominee is typically declared void. This means the legal basis for the foreigner’s control or ownership disappears. Furthermore, the company itself, if found to have been established or operated using illegal nominee structures, can be ordered for dissolution. This means the business ceases to exist, and all assets could be dealt with by the authorities.
Annual Audits and Corporate Tax
Companies operating in Thailand, regardless of their ownership structure, are subject to annual audits and corporate tax. If a company is found to be operating on a nominee structure, these audits can become a point of scrutiny. Any discrepancies or attempts to hide the true nature of ownership can lead to further penalties. Proper financial record-keeping is vital, and any unusual transactions related to share capital or dividend payments can raise suspicions.
Legal and Accounting Fees
While setting up a company might seem straightforward, using a nominee structure often leads to unexpected legal and accounting fees down the line. If authorities start investigating, you’ll likely need to hire legal experts to defend your position. Maintaining proper accounting records that reflect the true nature of the business, or attempting to disguise the nominee arrangement, can also incur significant costs. It’s often more expensive in the long run than setting things up correctly from the start.
Personal Tax Implications of Company Property Use
If a company owns property and that property is used by the foreign owner personally, there can be personal tax implications. For example, if the company pays for expenses related to the property that are essentially for the foreigner’s personal benefit, this could be treated as a taxable benefit. This adds another layer of complexity and potential cost to using a nominee structure.
Transparency and Legal Compliance
Operating a business with transparency and adhering to legal compliance is paramount. Nominee structures inherently lack transparency. They are designed to obscure the true ownership and control of a company. This lack of openness makes it difficult to comply with regulations and can attract unwanted attention from government agencies. Being upfront and honest about ownership is always the best policy.
Avoiding Perceptions of Tax Evasion
While the primary goal of a nominee structure might be to circumvent ownership laws, it can also create the perception of tax evasion. If the true beneficial owner is not declared, or if profits are channelled in ways that avoid proper taxation, authorities can investigate. This can lead to severe penalties, including back taxes, interest, and fines. It’s crucial to ensure all tax obligations are met correctly.
Impact on Future Business Ventures
Having a history of using illegal nominee structures can severely damage your reputation and impact future business ventures in Thailand. If authorities flag your company for non-compliance, it can make it difficult to obtain licenses, secure loans, or partner with other businesses. A clean record of legal compliance is a significant asset when building a business.
The Pitfalls of Shell Corporations
Sometimes, companies set up purely to hold assets, like property, without any real operational business activities, can be seen as shell corporations. These are often associated with nominee arrangements. Thai law generally requires companies to have genuine business activities. If a company is just a front for foreign ownership of property, it can be viewed with suspicion and may be subject to dissolution.
The Dangers of Unreliable Legal Advice
Getting advice from unqualified or unscrupulous individuals can lead you down the path of nominee structures. Some might present these arrangements as a simple workaround, downplaying the risks. However, relying on such advice can have disastrous consequences. It’s vital to seek counsel from reputable, experienced lawyers who understand Thai business law thoroughly.
Consequences of Dodgy Nominee Shareholders
When your nominee shareholders are not reliable, or if they decide to act in their own interest, you can find yourself in a very difficult situation. They might try to claim ownership of the shares they hold, or they might be pressured by authorities.
Seeking Reputable Legal Counsel
Always engage with reputable legal professionals who specialise in Thai corporate and property law. They can guide you through the legitimate avenues for foreign investment, such as obtaining a Foreign Business License or exploring options under the Board of Investment (BOI). Good legal advice is an investment, not an expense.
Maintaining Meticulous Records
Keep thorough and accurate records of all company transactions, shareholdings, and board decisions. This includes documenting the source of capital and the flow of dividends. Meticulous record-keeping can help demonstrate compliance and provide a defence if your company is ever investigated for nominee arrangements.
Increased Vigilance on Foreign Ownership
Government agencies in Thailand, including the Department of Business Development (DBD) and the Department of Special Investigation (DSI), are increasingly vigilant about foreign ownership structures. They are actively looking for companies that might be using nominee shareholders to circumvent the law. This heightened scrutiny means that risky arrangements are more likely to be detected.
Notable Crackdowns on Nominee Companies
There have been several high-profile crackdowns on companies found to be using nominee shareholders. These actions serve as a warning to others. Companies involved in such practices have faced significant penalties, including large fines and forced dissolution. These cases highlight the serious legal ramifications of non-compliance.
Court Rulings and Penalties Imposed
Court rulings have consistently upheld the illegality of nominee shareholder arrangements. Penalties imposed in these cases often include substantial fines for the company and individuals involved, as well as orders for the dissolution of the company. These legal precedents reinforce the message that such practices are not tolerated.
Potential Legislative Changes
While the current laws are quite clear, there’s always the possibility of legislative changes affecting foreign property ownership. Governments may introduce new regulations or tighten existing ones to better control foreign investment and protect national interests. Staying informed about potential policy shifts is advisable for any foreign investor.
Market Trends and Investor Demand
Market trends show a consistent demand from foreign investors for property and business opportunities in Thailand. However, there’s also a growing awareness of the legal complexities. Investors are increasingly seeking compliant and transparent ownership structures.
Balancing Investment with National Interests
Governments aim to balance attracting foreign investment with protecting national interests. This can sometimes lead to adjustments in foreign ownership laws. The goal is to encourage investment that benefits the Thai economy without compromising national security or economic stability.
Lack of Management and Control
One of the clearest indicators authorities look for is a lack of genuine management and control by the Thai shareholders. If the Thai shareholders are merely figureheads, with no real say in the company’s decisions or operations, it strongly suggests a nominee arrangement. Their involvement should be active and meaningful.
Voting Rights and Dividend Flow
How voting rights are exercised and how dividends are distributed can also be telling. If voting rights are consistently exercised according to the foreigner’s wishes, or if dividends are channelled back to the foreigner through unofficial means, it points towards a nominee setup. The flow of funds should align with actual share ownership and legal distribution channels.
Financing of Share Capital
The source of the capital used to purchase shares is a critical indicator. If the funds for the Thai shareholders’ capital contributions originate from the foreign investor, often transferred from abroad, this is a major red flag. Authorities will scrutinise the source of funds to ensure it’s not a disguised foreign investment.
BOI Promotion for Full Foreign Ownership
For certain types of businesses and investments, the Board of Investment (BOI) may grant promotional privileges that allow for full foreign ownership. This is a legitimate way to operate in Thailand without needing nominee structures. Companies that qualify for BOI promotion can enjoy various incentives and legal certainty.
Treaty of Amity Companies
Companies owned by nationals of countries that have a Treaty of Amity with Thailand may be permitted to operate businesses that are otherwise restricted. These treaties provide specific exemptions and allow for higher foreign ownership percentages under certain conditions. It’s worth exploring if your nationality qualifies.
Foreign Business Licenses
Obtaining a Foreign Business License (FBL) is the proper legal channel for foreigners to engage in businesses that are restricted under the Foreign Business Act. While the process can be rigorous, it provides a legitimate framework for foreign investment and ownership, avoiding the risks associated with nominee arrangements.
So, What’s the Takeaway?
Some villas in Phuket are held through existing Thai limited companies that own the land and buildings. This is not a way for a foreigner to own Thai land indirectly. The company has to qualify to own land in its own right, and its Thai shareholders have to be genuine investors acting for themselves. A 51/49 split alone does not make it legal, and using Thai nominees for a foreign owner is illegal. We’ve seen how things can go wrong, from hefty fines and legal trouble to the outright loss of your property. Where a villa is held through an existing company, we explain how the structure works and what it costs to run each year, and we recommend independent Thai legal and tax advice before you buy shares or commit. It’s better to be safe than sorry, and a bit of upfront effort can save you a world of pain down the line.
